WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Heidi Heitkamp criticized an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal that would reduce the effectiveness of the Renewable Fuel Standard, and damage North Dakota’s vibrant ethanol industry which has boosted the state’s economy and supported well-paying jobs.
Heitkamp, along with a bipartisan coalition of 30 other Senators, called on EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy to reverse the EPA’s decision to reduce the required amount of biofuels used in the U.S., and offer a new proposal that would promote investment in the next generation of biofuels.
“Congress passed the Renewable Fuel Standard to increase the amount of renewable fuel utilized in our nation’s fuel supply. The Administration’s proposal is a significant step backward – undermining the goal of increasing biofuels production as a domestic alternative to foreign oil consumption,” the Senators wrote in a letter to McCarthy. “Further, the proposed waiver places at risk both the environmental benefits from development of advanced biofuels and rural America’s economic future.”
Last month, Heitkamp met with McCarthy and called on her to reverse the EPA’s decision, which would reduce the amount of biofuels required to be blended in the U.S., and put instead forth a proposal that would promote investment in the next generation of biofuels, support our economy, and generate good jobs in rural North Dakota as the RFS currently does.
A full copy of the letter Heitkamp wrote is below:
The Honorable Gina McCarthy
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Administrator McCarthy:
We are writing to share serious concerns regarding the EPA’s proposal for the 2014 Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS.) Congress passed the RFS to increase the amount of renewable fuel utilized in our nation’s fuel supply. The Administration’s proposal is a significant step backward – undermining the goal of increasing biofuels production as a domestic alternative to foreign oil consumption. Further, the proposed waiver places at risk both the environmental benefits from ongoing development of advanced biofuels and rural America’s economic future. We urge you to modify your proposal.
The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) provides the EPA with significant authority to adjust to shifting conditions over the 15-year life of the policy. In any given year, EPA can adjust the advanced biofuel and total biofuel volumes based on anticipated production. While EPA has used the authority to adjust biofuels levels in the past based on anticipated production levels, your proposal, for the first time, adjusts the 2014 overall volumes based on criteria not clearly identified in the law below anticipated production levels of biofuels and even below previous years’ RFS levels.
Further, defining the “blend wall” as blends of E10 and then waiving RFS requirements beyond the blend wall creates significant barriers to future biofuels growth. Lack of infrastructure remains one of the key hurdles to further deployment of biofuels into the market. Limiting RFS to levels that can be met with existing infrastructure eliminates incentives to invest in the technologies and infrastructure necessary to meet our domestic policy goal of increasing biofuels production and use.
If the rule as proposed were adopted, it will:
- Replace domestic biofuel production with fossil fuels, contributing to a greater dependence on foreign sources of oil and reduce our energy security.
- Increase unemployment as renewable fuel producers cut back production.
- Halt investments in cellulosic, biodiesel and other advanced renewable fuels. Rolling back the RFS will, potentially strand billions of dollars of private capital;
- Undermine the deployment of renewable fuels infrastructure throughout the country;
- Threaten the viability of the RFS, thereby solidifying an oil-based transportation sector and lowering consumer choice at the pump.
With these concerns in mind, we request that EPA revise the proposed 2014 RVOs in a manner that promotes investments in the next generation of biofuels and the infrastructure necessary to deploy those fuels into the market. Without a revised proposal, the EPA’s rule will bring severe economic consequences, and prevent the growth of the renewable fuel sector.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.